como se aborda un fenómeno desconocido de manera científica

[sergio moragrega]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WgURI1 ... X4Z0J/view

"...Speed, acceleration, and power characteristics can be calculated based on statements
from two navy personnel who observed the radar tracks of the “Tic-Tacs” in real time. The
Senior Chief in charge of radar took notes while observing the radar in the CIC area, and noted
that his equipment indicated that the object moved from 80,000+ feet to 20,000 feet in 0.78
second. A second man, the Petty Officer stationed in the same room at the same time as the
Senior Chief, characterized the erratic movements of the objects from stationary at 80,000 feet to
stationary at 20,000 feet on radar as “as fast as a thought.” Calculations based on these
observations, 60,000 vertical feet in 0.78 second and an initial and final velocity of zero, and
assuming a constant acceleration (linear velocity) changing to a deceleration midway, yield a
maximum velocity of 104,895 mph at the midway point, and an acceleration of 12,250 g-forces
(see Appendix G). If one of the navy's jets of a similar size (F/A-18F at 18 tons) accelerated at
this rate, it would need 90 gigawatts of power.
These numbers are nonsensical to any known aircraft; one would expect to see a fireball
due to air friction at those speeds and one would not anticipate any known aircraft to remain
structurally intact with such large g-forces. We examine these characteristics from a second and
third set of data to compare with the above results. This is done in Sections 3.2 and 3.3..."

[pfdc]

Que en algún momento se remita o se cite un texto en ingles es una cosa, y otra cosa es que se copie una parrafada, de la que ademas no cita la fuente. La ufologia no tiene cabida aquí así que cierro el tema.
Salud!!